From pages to screens: what makes film adaptations of books successful?


You probably have an opinion on whether or not the Harry potter the movies accurately portray the books. In fact, are there any movies that can do their book justice? There are several factors that go into determining whether or not a book will become a successful movie or franchise. So where exactly did Harry potter Earth?

Betway Casino has delved into the most successful film adaptations of books to find out the truth. Movies are ranked based on particular data points to determine their success against books. Data points are based on box office revenue, movie rating, and how the movie compares to the book’s original story.

The most lucrative film adaptation of a book, according to Betway Casino, has been Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2. With a staggering $ 1.34 billion in theaters, the final Era of the Dead surpassed other films like The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King ($ 1.15 billion), Jurrasique Park ($ 1.03 billion), Alice in Wonderland ($ 1.03 billion), and The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey ($ 1.02 billion).

Of course, part of the success of the final Harry potter movie could very well be attributed to the public hype. A similar explanation could be drawn for the third installment of the the Lord of the Rings movie theater. If you think about it “There was, for example, no realistic chance that the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 the film was set to fall apart after seven books and seven films built hysteria around the series to astronomical levels. That’s not to say the movies weren’t good enough to stand alone, but the hype helps.

The idea is also supported by IMDb reviews of other book-film adaptations. For example, the highest rated film based on a book is Shawshank’s Redemption, with a score of 9.3 out of 10. Just below is The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (8.9), The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (8.8), Forrest Gump (8.8), and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (8.7). In fact, none of the Harry potter movies ranked anywhere in the top 10 on IMDb.

No "Harry potter" the film ranks in the top 10 best rated film adaptations of books.

Now, it’s a bit of an understatement to say that movies are never as good as the movies they’re based on. According to research done by Betway Casino, it appears that the quality of the books themselves is often what drives films to be so widely accepted by audiences. According to data collected from IMDb and Goodreads, the Harry potter books rank significantly higher than equivalent films. Harry potter and the wizardstone, the film, was rated 7.6 out of 10 while the book was rated 8.9. At the end of the series, Deathly Hallows – Parts 1 and 2 got a slightly higher score of 7.9 and the book got a score of 9.2.

None of "Harry potter" the films were rated higher than their book counterparts.

The same figure can be applied to other standalone films released. For example, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King was rated 8.1 from IMDb while the book was rated 9.1 from Goodreads. Alice in Wonderland is another vivid example. The IMDb rating gives the film a 6.4 vs. 8.1 Goodreads rating. None of the more lucrative film adaptations have performed better than their book counterparts.

The data has spoken. While there are several points to look out for, it’s pretty obvious that books can make wonderful movies and be successful in big franchises such as Harry potter and The Lord of the Rings Often piggyback on the hype of their book counterparts. Do you think the Harry potter are films precise and successful adaptations of books? Let us know!

Want more posts like this? MuggleNet is 99% run by volunteers, and we need your help. With your monthly $ 1 pledge, you can interact with the creators, suggest ideas for future items, and participate in exclusive promotional giveaways!
Support us on Patreon

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.